Canon PowerShot S100 / Digital IXUS Digital Camera
13.3 Megapixel, Compact Camera, 3 in. LCD Screen, 5x Optical Zoom, With High Definition Video, Weight: 0.41 lb. (0.19 kg)
|
| |
|
| Overall Rating: |
(126 total reviews)
|
| Ease of Use: |  |
| Durability: |  |
| Battery Life: |  |
| Photo Quality: |  |
| Shutter Lag |  |
|
|
|
|
SORT BY:
Review Date | Product rating
|
Showing 1 - 10 of about 126 Consumer Reviews
|
|
old faithful
by designatedrivr, Nov 24, 2004
Pros: sturdy, sexy, compact flash type 1
Cons: ? there are newer models, plastic door, proprietary connector, off center tripod mount
Review: This is one sweet machine I picked it up when my friend upgrade to one of the new iterations. three ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
 |
| Durability: |
 |
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
 |
| Shutter Lag |
 |
|
|
|
S100 So easy to use even and Old Pa.Dutchman can
by greggandnancy, May 23, 2004
Pros: Size, quality of photographs, simple to use, and well made.
Cons: Didn't have the money to buy two.
Review: The S100, so easy to use even and Old Pa.Dutchman can use it with ease. It was a gift from our son a ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
 |
| Durability: |
 |
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
 |
| Shutter Lag |
 |
|
|
|
1.5 years then problems
by ebaldy, Jan 19, 2004
Pros: compact size, ease of use
Cons: poor quality, useless after a couple years
The Bottom Line: don't buy canon. spend more and get something that will last
Review: I loved this camera when I first got it. It was portable, was easy to use, and took good pictures Af ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
 |
| Durability: |
 |
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
 |
| Shutter Lag |
 |
|
|
|
First & favorite digital camera
by mizubara, Jun 4, 2003
Pros: Size of cigarette pack. Crisp pictures. Many functions. Great first digital cam!
Cons: Battery = Abnormal (special order); Must recharge often. Slower operation in cold weather.
The Bottom Line: This camera performed better than I had expected. Between Kodak, Epson, & Canon, this one's my favorite. It's easy & convenient. I take it everywhere!
Review: When I saw commercials for the Elph, I knew that I had to buy one. They are so small, functional, ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
 |
| Durability: |
 |
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
 |
| Shutter Lag |
 |
|
|
|
Fatal Failure After Two Years
by lenkrauss, Jun 1, 2003
Pros: Small size
Cons: Durability Battery Life
The Bottom Line: Would not buy any Canon product again. Not pleased with their customer service, and have since discovered many others agree with what I learned the hard way.
Review: After paying $500 for it a little over two years ago, the camera no longer takes properly exposed da ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
 |
| Durability: |
 |
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
 |
| Shutter Lag |
 |
|
|
|
A Take Anywhere Wonder
by tj_of_calgary, Jan 15, 2003
Pros: Re-chargable Battery, Size, Weight, Photo Preview, Quiet
Cons: Performance in Cold Weather, Menu, Storage
The Bottom Line: The cost has really come down. Excellent reproduction quality in a small and easy to use package. Has some great basic and advanced features.
Review: My wife and purchased this camera in November of 2000 when we decided to build a new home. The main ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
|
|
|
you will fall in love with the camera
by kelvin123, Sep 16, 2002
Pros: Tiny, Quick camera
Cons: Poor flash, lack of manual options.
The Bottom Line: If someone offers this at less than $250, buy it.
Review: I have been using this camera for a year and a half and have taken more than 2500 pics in different ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
 |
| Durability: |
 |
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
 |
|
|
|
Great Value
by ronharder, Aug 16, 2002
Pros: compact, durable, easy to use.
Cons: slow, limited zoom, software
The Bottom Line: Great value! If you're an amateur like me just looking for a quality camera that's small, easy to use, and takes good pictures, then this is for you.
Review: Overall, this is a fantastic buy. I've owned this camera since October of 2001 and have gotten a lot ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
 |
| Durability: |
 |
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
 |
|
|
|
S100 - TINY, TINY, TINY
by birnboim, Aug 15, 2002
Pros: One word describes this camera - TINY. This is, without a doubt the best feature.
Cons: Battery & software management are not as good newer models
The Bottom Line: Buy it only if you can't get a S110 or S200
Review: This is a great line, by Canon. However, if you can afford the S110 or S200 cameras, then I would d ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
 |
| Durability: |
 |
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
 |
|
|
|
Not yet two years into it, I must replace this camera
by Marc_Matthews, Jul 24, 2002
Pros: Small Size
Cons: Poor quality - replaced by a new model every 6 months
The Bottom Line: Lots of other reviews telling you the basics, I wanted to give another perspective. This camera did not hold up over time and should be avoided for that reason.
Review: I bought this the S100 (aka Digital Elph) in January 2001 for my wife. She wanted an Elph camera - ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
 |
| Durability: |
 |
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|